We all have our own identities, which can be interpreted as simply as our name. Even if we delve as deeply as to include our likes and dislikes, or our opinions on world matters, we are still all tethered to our country. No matter how different I am from anyone I meet on a standard day, they are all British, as I am. Of course, when we actually live in the country that we are seen as originating from, it can be difficult to say 'I'm British because...'
As it seems relevant to our study of John Cheever and what it is to be American, I'm going to mention my three cousins. They were born in the UK, but at a young age moved over to the USA. I see them about once every two years, and I often forget that they once were 'British'. It often makes me wonder; what would I have been like today if my family had moved to the USA when I could barely walk? I'd consider myself American, and I'd probably find the concept of tea and scones quite alien (Not that these two things define us, of course.) One of my cousins still supports England in the World Cup, so does she consider herself British at heart? It's something we can't really comprehend: spending our childhood in another country.
When reading 'Goodbye, my Brother' by Cheever, I found myself creating my standard compilation of 'My America'. As I've never ventured over to that side of the globe, It fell to my imagination, along with clips from films, to create my mental image of where the story was based. It's interesting to think what Americans would have in their mind's eye when armed with a British novel and memories of Notting Hill or Johnny English. Maybe I need to go and visit my cousins and shatter my imagined/film inspired USA!
Sunday, 27 February 2011
Sunday, 20 February 2011
Liar Liar
It's interesting how little we think about what we say sometimes as we go through our day. After writing down my biggest lie on Monday, I decided that I would go the rest of the week without telling another one. That of course had me stuttering once or twice when I remembered I was prohibitied from lying, but it showed me that maybe I do lie a little too often! This also made me think: Do I ever include lies in any of my writing? I don't think I've ever done that, so that could be an interesting challenge for one of our assessment pieces, perhaps.
Now, to business. The Truth I believe is a complex tool that we can use in writing. When I first thought about it, I imagined that the truth can be bent to the writer's advantage. For example, if I wrote 'In the land of Tomlin, you could be sentenced to death for eating sausage rolls.', you would have to take my word for it, because the fictional world of Tomlin is my creation (Don't worry, this strange dimension doesn't exist, trust me.) A fictional world that is created by an author adheres to his or her rules, and therefore the truth relies purely on what they write.
Of course, if the author is writing a more realistic peace where the world isn't named after his or her surname, then it is easier to identify the truth, especially in what people say. What I feel I'm digressing to here is believability, but this is closely knit with the concept of truth. Of course, a good writer, especially in the realms of fantasy or sci-fi, has to uphold a certain degree of believability. When thinking about this, would they really bother to tie in some lies? It would only undermine their work, so I guess not.
Although I've led myself a little off topic, I've chosen not to hold the backspace and start over, because I feel believability is an important device for all writers. That said, I'll leave you with an interesting website about lying I stumbled upon... Have a good week!
Now, to business. The Truth I believe is a complex tool that we can use in writing. When I first thought about it, I imagined that the truth can be bent to the writer's advantage. For example, if I wrote 'In the land of Tomlin, you could be sentenced to death for eating sausage rolls.', you would have to take my word for it, because the fictional world of Tomlin is my creation (Don't worry, this strange dimension doesn't exist, trust me.) A fictional world that is created by an author adheres to his or her rules, and therefore the truth relies purely on what they write.
Of course, if the author is writing a more realistic peace where the world isn't named after his or her surname, then it is easier to identify the truth, especially in what people say. What I feel I'm digressing to here is believability, but this is closely knit with the concept of truth. Of course, a good writer, especially in the realms of fantasy or sci-fi, has to uphold a certain degree of believability. When thinking about this, would they really bother to tie in some lies? It would only undermine their work, so I guess not.
Although I've led myself a little off topic, I've chosen not to hold the backspace and start over, because I feel believability is an important device for all writers. That said, I'll leave you with an interesting website about lying I stumbled upon... Have a good week!
Monday, 7 February 2011
Step One
I'll start by commenting on how strange I feel writing a blog that I know will be graded eventually, especially as I haven't blogged before, I do hope there's not a knack to it! But onto more pressing matters...
Today's seminar was interesting in the way it was kind of looking down the barrel of a gun. We were put on the spot and made to write why we want to be writers, and I'd like to think I wasn't the only one that hesitated a little. As someone that spends quite a lot of time writing, I often don't think about the exact reason why I do it. Of course, being published would be the pinnacle success, but doesn't every writer hope for that? I suppose that for every writer there are two kinds of reasons why they write, but generally speaking, I think the personal reasons outweigh the financial.
Something else that struck me about the lesson today was learning about John Cheever, and how he left his education in order to pursue his writing career. The act in itself was remarkable, but the courage needed to actually go through with it astounds me. How could he be sure his writing was good enough? I admire Cheever’s confidence in himself to take the steps he did, and I wouldn’t be able to say I could have done the same. I always second guess my own work, to the point where it halts my creative process. Hopefully this won’t always be the case.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)